Physically active learning and school-based physical activity interventions in reducing sedentary time among secondary school students: literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15561/health.2026.0205Keywords:
physically active learning, sitting time, school-based intervention, secondary school students, physical activity, school, sedentary behaviorAbstract
Background and Study Aim. Sedentary behavior has become a growing concern among secondary school students in contemporary educational settings. Learning activities, screen use, and classroom routines often require students to remain seated for prolonged periods, limiting opportunities for movement during the school day. School-based strategies, including physically active learning, active classrooms, and multi-component physical activity interventions, are increasingly used to address this issue. Despite the application of these approaches, their relative effectiveness in reducing excessive sedentary time among adolescents remains a matter of practical interest. This study aimed to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of physically active learning and school-based physical activity interventions in reducing excessive sedentary time among secondary school students.
Materials and Methods. This study employed a literature review design following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Articles were identified through searches of Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, ERIC, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The analyzed articles were published in English-language, peer-reviewed journals between 2020 and 2026. Of the 422 articles identified during the initial search, 10 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final narrative synthesis.
Results. The analyzed articles included randomized controlled trials, cluster-randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, non-randomized trials, and qualitative studies. The interventions comprised physically active learning, physically active lessons, classroom-based physical activity, active classroom strategies, height-adjustable desks, activity breaks, and school-based multi-component interventions. Most studies demonstrated positive trends in reducing sedentary time, sitting time, or screen time, and in increasing physical activity. However, some studies reported limited or non-significant effects on overall sedentary behavior.
Conclusions. Physically active learning and school-based physical activity interventions have the potential to reduce sedentary time among secondary school students. The effectiveness of these interventions is influenced by programme duration, implementation quality, teacher engagement, measurement methods, and school support. Future research should employ more robust experimental designs, longer intervention periods, and objective measurement tools such as accelerometers.
References
Parrish AM, Okely AD, Salmon J, Trost S, Hammersley M, Murdoch A. Making ‘being less sedentary feel normal’ –investigating ways to reduce adolescent sedentary behaviour at school: a qualitative study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2023;20(1): 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01444-y
Li H, Zhang W, Yan J. Physical activity and sedentary behavior among school-going adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: insights from the global school-based health survey. PeerJ, 2024;12: e17097. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17097
Saudi L, Lameky VY. A Systematic Review of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Screen Time in Youth Aged 7–18. Journal of Pubnursing Sciences, 2025;3(01): 30–41. https://doi.org/10.69606/jps.v3i01.218
Kuzik N, Da Costa BGG, Hwang Y, Verswijveren SJJM, Rollo S, Tremblay MS, et al. School-related sedentary behaviours and indicators of health and well-being among children and youth: a systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2022;19(1): 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01258-4
Haghjoo P, Siri G, Soleimani E, Farhangi MA, Alesaeidi S. Screen time increases overweight and obesity risk among adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. BMC Primary Care, 2022;23(1): 161. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01761-4
Mateo-Orcajada A, González-Gálvez N, Abenza-Cano L, Vaquero-Cristóbal R. Differences in Physical Fitness and Body Composition Between Active and Sedentary Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2022;51(2): 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01552-7
Wang CH, Peiper N. Association Between Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior With Depressive Symptoms Among US High School Students, 2019. Preventing Chronic Disease, 2022;19: 220003. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd19.220003
Zhang L, Zhao S, Zhao S, Zheng H, Ke Y, Yang W, et al. Sedentary Behavior and Its Association With Psychological Well-Being and Sleep Quality in Adolescents: Evidence from a Propensity Score Analysis. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2025;Volume 18: 281–298. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S508382
Leonhardt C, Danielsen D, Andersen S. Associations between screen use, learning and concentration among children and young people in western countries: a scoping review. Children and Youth Services Review, 2025;177: 108508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108508
Contardo Ayala AM, Parker K, Mazzoli E, Lander N, Ridgers ND, Timperio A, et al. Effectiveness of Intervention Strategies to Increase Adolescents’ Physical Activity and Reduce Sedentary Time in Secondary School Settings, Including Factors Related to Implementation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Medicine - Open, 2024;10(1): 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-024-00688-7
Prabowo TA, Indarto AV, Cahyo FD, Afifah M, Zakaria A. Extracurricular sports as a tool for character development and well-being in secondary school student: scoping review. Riyadhoh : Jurnal Pendidikan Olahraga, 2025;8(1): 72. https://doi.org/10.31602/rjpo.v8i1.18623
Guo L, He H, Wang C. Are school-based behavioural interventions an effective strategy for improving physical activity and sedentary behaviour in children and adolescents? A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 2025;13: 1532035. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1532035
He H, Yang Y, Sun J, Wang F, Zhang W, Zhu F. Effects of school-based physical activity on academic achievement in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 2025;13: 1651883. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1651883
González-Pérez M, Camiletti-Moirón D, Ruiz-Hermosa A, Martín-Acosta F, Grao-Cruces A, Sánchez-Oliva D. Effect of physically active learning on physical activity levels in secondary school students: The ACTIVE CLASS Study. BMC Public Health, 2026;26(1): 1218. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-26814-6
Johansen JM, Mandelid MB, Reinboth M, Resaland GK, Bratland-Sanda S. Physical activity and content in a variety of physically active learning: an observational case study of real-world practices. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2025;6: 1504704. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1504704
Gammon C, Morton K, Atkin A, Corder K, Daly-Smith A, Quarmby T, et al. Introducing physically active lessons in UK secondary schools: feasibility study and pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 2019;9(5): e025080. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025080
Ruiz-Hermosa A, Sánchez-Oliva D, Grao-Cruces A, Medrano M, González-Pérez M, Martín-Acosta F, et al. Feasibility, Acceptability, and Effectiveness of Physically Active Lessons in Secondary Education: ACTIVE CLASS Pilot Study. Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine, 2025;10(2). https://doi.org/10.1249/TJX.0000000000000290
Schmidt SK, Bratland-Sanda S, Bongaardt R. Secondary school teachers’ experiences with classroom-based physically active learning: “I’m excited, but it’s really hard”. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2022;116: 103753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103753
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021; n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
González-Pérez M, Sánchez-Oliva D, Martín-Acosta F, Ruiz-Hermosa A, Camiletti-Moirón D, Grao-Cruces A. A mixed-methods approach of the effect of physically active learning on time-on-task in the secondary education class: The ACTIVE CLASS study. Learning and Instruction, 2025;97: 102091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102091
Christiansen F, Ahlqvist VH, Nyroos M, Löfgren H, Berglind D. Physical Activity through a Classroom-Based Intervention: A Pragmatic Non-Randomized Trial among Swedish Adolescents in an Upper Secondary School. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021;18(21): 11041. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111041
Da Costa RM, Lopes MVV, Da Costa BGG, Malheiros LEA, Dos Santos PC, Arundell L, et al. Effect of a school-based multicomponent intervention on time-segmented physical activity and sedentary behavior among adolescents: a cluster randomized control trial. BMC Public Health, 2025;25(1): 4090. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25314-3
Ahmed KR, Kolbe-Alexander T, Khan A. Effectiveness of a school-based intervention on physical activity and screen time among adolescents. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2022;25(3): 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2021.10.007
Dos Santos PC, Salmon J, Arundell L, Lopes MVV, Silva KS. Effectiveness and moderators of a multicomponent school-based intervention on screen time devices: the Movimente cluster-randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 2021;21(1): 1852. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11895-2
Hankonen N, Haukkala A, Palsola M, Heino MTJ, Sund R, Tokola K, et al. Effectiveness of the Let’s Move It multi-level vocational school-based intervention on physical activity and sedentary behavior: a cluster randomized trial. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2025;59(1): kaaf023. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaaf023
Sudholz B, Contardo Ayala AM, Timperio A, Dunstan DW, Conroy DE, Abbott G, et al. The impact of height-adjustable desks and classroom prompts on classroom sitting time, social, and motivational factors among adolescents. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2023;12(1): 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.05.002
Ricardo-Sejin JR, Arango-Paternina CM, Patiño-Villada FA. Effects of a school-based intervention on 24-hour movement behaviors in adolescents: A quasi-experimental study. Tilga H (ed.) PLOS One, 2025;20(11): e0336696. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336696
Beserra V, Nussbaum M, Navarrete M, Garrido N, Alvares D. The Use of Physically Active Academic Lessons During the Transition to Face-to-Face Classes. Sage Open, 2024;14(2): 21582440241255429. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241255429
Mandelid MB, Resaland GK, Lerum Ø, Teslo S, Chalkley A, Singh A, et al. Unpacking physically active learning in education: a movement didaktikk approach in teaching? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 2024;68(3): 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2148271
McMichan L, Gibson AM, Rowe DA. Classroom-Based Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Interventions in Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 2018;15(5): 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2017-0087
Carrasco-Uribarren A, Ortega-Martínez A, Amor-Barbosa M, Cadellans-Arróniz A, Cabanillas-Barea S, Bagur-Calafat MC. Improvement of In-School Physical Activity with Active School-Based Interventions to Interrupt Prolonged Sitting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023;20(2): 1636. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021636
Fisher D, Louw Q. The Effect of Classroom-Based Interventions on Sedentary Behavior and Spinal Health in Schoolchildren: Systematic Review. Interactive Journal of Medical Research, 2022;11(2): e39006. https://doi.org/10.2196/39006
Moeller NC, Oestergaard L, Rasmussen MGB, Schmidt-Persson J, Larsen KT, Juhl CB. How to get children moving? The effectiveness of school-based interventions promoting physical activity in children and adolescents – A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled- and controlled studies. Health & Place, 2024;89: 103333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103333
Rodrigo-Sanjoaquín J, Tapia-Serrano MÁ, López-Gil JF, Sevil-Serrano J. Effects of school-based interventions on all 24-hour movement behaviours in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 2025;11(2): e002593. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002593
Mori T, Aoki T, Oishi K, Harada T, Tanaka C, Tanaka S, et al. Relative age effect on the physical activity and sedentary behavior in children and adolescents aged 10 to 18 years old: a cross-sectional study in Japan. BMC Public Health, 2024;24(1): 3273. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20659-7
Duan P, Li C, Yuan Z, Yuan J, Feng X. Multi-component school intervention reduces obesity and improves health behaviors in children: a cluster- randomized controlled trial. Scientific Reports, 2025;15(1): 40607. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-24295-y
Teslo S, Thurston M, Lerum Ø, Brekke Mandelid M, Sørnes Jenssen E, Resaland GK, et al. Teachers’ sensemaking of physically active learning: A qualitative study of primary and secondary school teachers participating in a continuing professional development program in Norway. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2023;127: 104113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104113
Downloads
Received
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Trisnar Adi Prabowo, Mar'atul Afifah, Asyidika Vito Indarto, Zakwan Yumna Dhuha Pahlavi, Achmad Zakaria, Febriansyah Dwi Cahyo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Holder - Author(s). more
Abstract views: 68 / PDF downloads: 33


